MAGEC® System
If you have questions about treatment with the MAGEC system, please consult your health care provider.
If you have questions about treatment with the MAGEC system, please consult your health care provider.
The MAGEC system utilizes innovative magnetic technology within adjustable growing rods and an external remote controller (ERC) to help avoid distraction surgeries from the treatment for early-onset scoliosis (EOS). As a result, MAGEC helps reduce associated complication risks from repetitive surgeries, and simplifies the care and journey of an EOS patient.
The MAGEC system has magnetic resonance conditional clearance. To read more about the cleared specifications, click here.
Is MAGEC right for my child?
The MAGEC system allows patients to receive the same benefits found in traditional growing rod treatment with the added benefit of noninvasive distractions. Planned distractions take place in an office setting and are generally quick and painless. As a result, your child is spared from planned distraction surgeries that can keep him or her out of school, away from friends, and in consistent recovery for extended periods of time.
By helping reduce the anxiety, cost, and time experienced with repetitive surgeries, MAGEC helps simplify care for EOS patients and families. This procedure may be used to treat the following condition:
1. Akbarnia BA, Pawelek JB, Cheung KM, et al. Traditional growing rods versus magnetically controlled growing rods for the surgical treatment of early-onset scoliosis: a case-matched 2-year study. Spine Deformity. 2014;2(6):493-497.
2. Yoon WW, Sedra F, Shah S, et al. Improvement of pulmonary function in children with early-onset scoliosis using magnetic growth rods. Spine. 2014;39 (15):1196-1202.
3. Backeljauw B, Holland SK, Altaye M, et al. Cognition and Brain Structure Following Early Childhood Surgery With Anesthesia. PEDIATRICS 2015;136(1):2014-3526
4. Bess S, Akbarnia BA, Thompson GH, et al. Complications of growing-rod treatment for early-onset scoliosis: analysis of one hundred and forty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010;92(15):2533-43.
5. Yazici M, Demirkiran HG, Olgun ZD, et al. Health-Related quality of life in early-onset scoliosis patients treated surgically: EOSQ scores in traditional growing rod vs. magnetically-controlled growing rods. Spine Deformity, 2016;4(6):455.
6. Polly D, Ackerman SJ, Schneider K, et al. Cost analysis of magnetically controlled growing rods compared with traditional growing rods for early-onset scoliosis in the US: an integrated health care delivery system perspective. ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research, 2016:8: 457-65.
7. Su AW, Milbrandt TA, Larson AN. Magnetic expansion control system achieves cost savings compared to traditional growth rods: an economic analysis model. Spine 2015;40(23):1851-6.