1. Akbarnia BA, Pawelek JB, Cheung KM, et al. Traditional growing rods versus magnetically controlled growing rods for the surgical treatment of early-onset scoliosis: a case-matched 2-year study. Spine Deformity. 2014;2(6):493-497.
2. Yoon WW, Sedra F, Shah S, et al. Improvement of pulmonary function in children with early-onset scoliosis using magnetic growth rods. Spine. 2014;39 (15):1196-1202.
3. Backeljauw B, Holland SK, Altaye M, et al. Cognition and Brain Structure Following Early Childhood Surgery With Anesthesia. PEDIATRICS 2015;136(1):2014-3526
4. Bess S, Akbarnia BA, Thompson GH, et al. Complications of growing-rod treatment for early-onset scoliosis: analysis of one hundred and forty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010;92(15):2533-43.
5. Yazici M, Demirkiran HG, Olgun ZD, et al. Health-Related quality of life in early-onset scoliosis patients treated surgically: EOSQ scores in traditional growing rod vs. magnetically-controlled growing rods. Spine Deformity, 2016;4(6):455.
6. Polly D, Ackerman SJ, Schneider K, et al. Cost analysis of magnetically controlled growing rods compared with traditional growing rods for early-onset scoliosis in the US: an integrated health care delivery system perspective. ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research, 2016:8: 457-65.
7. Su AW, Milbrandt TA, Larson AN. Magnetic expansion control system achieves cost savings compared to traditional growth rods: an economic analysis model. Spine 2015;40(23):1851-6.